DEFINITION OF MURDER ACCORDING TO FLORIDA

The definition of murder according to Florida Lawmakers.
In Florida all who participate in a fatal robbery are equally guilty of first degree murder whether they were responsible for the death or not. 
The case of Jennifer Mee who gained fame as a teenager as The Hiccup Girl when she suffered from an incurable bout of hiccups is a perfect example of how this law works.
At 19 Jennifer arranged a date with a young man whom she contacted on Facebook but while he had romance on his mind, Jennifer's motive was robbery; her two male friends carried out the mugging and it was during this process that the victim was fatally shot.
Jennifer had her day in court along with the others and was convicted of first degree murder; her sentence was life without the possibility of parole.
The sentence Jennifer received shocked so many people and does raise some serious questions of the prosecution and they are;
1. What justification is there for such a severe sentence?
2. Is Jennifer a danger to the public if released?
There are two serious sticking points as far as I am concerned and they are;
1. Jennifer did not at any stage intend to kill the victim. 
2. Who is responsible for a fatality caused by a firearm?
First one first; so if Jennifer did not ever intend to kill the victim, it could hardly be described as premeditated murder and there are examples of offenders guilty of premeditated murder receiving a shorter sentence than Jennifer. 
It is not known if the two male offenders who actually carried out the mugging ever intended to kill the victim or the exact location of Jennifer during the mugging.
Second question is who is responsible for a death caused by a firearm?
Isn't the person who is in possession of the firearm the one who should be held responsible for whatever happens after he/she pulls the trigger?
In Jennifer's case, she is guilty by association.
One may argue that she set this whole thing up but it was robbery which was her motive. The murder should have been treated as a separate crime altogether which she was not responsible for.
The prosecution has a lot to answer for in this case and does not seem to be made accountable for miscarriages of justice.
I have written to a number of US politicians about this and have not received even an acknowledgement from them but I will keep writing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SOCIAL STATUS & AMERICAN SENTENCING

Image
Sentencing based on social standing At high school when someone got the cane or strap, the other kids would make fun of the person if they were not that popular but if they were popular among their peers then after getting the strap or cane it would always  be, "Mr so and so is a w*****. It is the same in real life where people get treated according to their personality, attractiveness, and their social status.  As far as the American justice system is concerned, I think it would be extremely simplistic to say "Everyone is treated the same way," and the various sentences handed down by judges reflects this. The sentencing of Jennifer Mee is a prime example. She was convicted of first degree murder. What was her crime? She participated in a fatal robbery and all those who took part in a robbery where someone dies are equally guilty of murder whether were directly or indirectly involved in the death. As far as Jennifer's situation is concerned, it app
Read more

JENNIFER'S CASE HAS A CASE FOR A PRESIDENTIAL PARDON

Image
  Jennifer Mee's case needs to be reviewed Jennifer Mee was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole after being convicted of first degree murder in 2010. She was 19 at the time.  The case Jennifer set up a date with a young man whom she had contacted on Facebook but with the intention of robbing him. Her two male friends carried out the robbery and it was during this process that one of them shot the victim. Jennifer did not ever intend for this to happen. There are three factors that need to be considered in cases involving murder because not all cases are the same. There are factors which need to be considered are determining factors in sentencing. I have come up with a list: 1. Was it premeditated/intentional? 2. Was any malice involved? 3. Was revenge a factor? The answer to these questions in Jennifer's case is, "No." Another question is, "Who's responsible for the discharge of a firearm?" Is it the person who is in possessi
Read more

Just what is the meaning of intent?

Image
Just what is the meaning of intent? Written by R. A. Stewart In the United States a person can be sent to prison for the rest of their life for a murder they did not commit and for a death that had no intent involved. How? In many states any person who is involved in a crime which leads to a person’s death can be charged with first degree murder.  Whether they had anything to do with the death or not it does not matter. Just being a party to the crime makes them equally guilty of murder as the one who committed the actual murder. It all boils down to who's responsible for the fatality and whether the actions of another contributed to another person’s death. This is called the “Felony rule.”  You do not even have to be responsible for the person’s death to be responsible for their death; if you just idly stood by and did nothing while others attacked and killed someone then your inaction caused another person’s death and therefore it means you are partly responsible for the fata
Read more