FLORIDA LAWMAKER'S DICTIONARY

The Florida dictionary according to lawmakers
The Florida lawmakers seem to be reading a different dictionary from the rest of us if you examine the Jennifer Mee case.
Jennifer was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole after she was party to a fatal robbery.
At no stage did she ever intend to kill the victim. 
So we come to our first word, "Premeditated."
What does that word mean?
"Planned in advance," "a premeditated attack."
In Jennifer's case, robbery was planned in advance but not the victim.
I understand that first and second degree murder is a killing which was premeditated.
Then how did Jennifer get to be charged with first degree murder?
Next word is "manslaughter."
At school the teacher told us the difference between murder and manslaughter is murder is when you killed someone intentionally while manslaughter is when you accidently killed someone.
So if a drunk driver kills someone is it murder or manslaughter?
What is the difference between someone who deliberately drives a car into a crowd and someone dies and someone else who makes an error of judgement such as texting someone while driving and has an accident as a result?
"intent."
It is their intent which determines whether they have committed murder or manslaughter.
The dictionary describes intent as this, "If you are intent on doing something you are determined to do it."
There is no doubt whatsoever that Jennifer never ever intended to kill the victim.
So how can she be guilty of murder?
I don't know what is worse, being convicted of first degree murder or being sentenced without the possibility of parole.
This was a high profile case because of Jennifer's notoriety as the "Hiccup Girl." It polarised more than a community, it made television headlines beyond Florida, so I wonder whether Jennifer would have received the same sentence if this was just a run of the mill murder case in America. 
Judges are supposed to rise above emotions during court cases but I cannot honestly say whether in this case the judge did or didn't rise about the emotion of the case or what motivated him or her to hand down such a sentence but I am interested to hear the justification for it.
The bottom line is Jennifer should not have been charged with first degree murder at all but then to be sentenced to life without the possibility of parole is inhumane and unjust.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SOCIAL STATUS & AMERICAN SENTENCING

Image
Sentencing based on social standing At high school when someone got the cane or strap, the other kids would make fun of the person if they were not that popular but if they were popular among their peers then after getting the strap or cane it would always  be, "Mr so and so is a w*****. It is the same in real life where people get treated according to their personality, attractiveness, and their social status.  As far as the American justice system is concerned, I think it would be extremely simplistic to say "Everyone is treated the same way," and the various sentences handed down by judges reflects this. The sentencing of Jennifer Mee is a prime example. She was convicted of first degree murder. What was her crime? She participated in a fatal robbery and all those who took part in a robbery where someone dies are equally guilty of murder whether were directly or indirectly involved in the death. As far as Jennifer's situation is concerned, it app...
Read more

Justice for Jennifer

Image
Written by R. A. Stewart A criminal justice system needs to be fair to everyone; those affected by the offender’s action and the offender. Sentences must reflect the seriousness of the crime taking into account the various aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Justice can mean different things to different people.  I can tell you what justice is not. It is not a means of taking revenge on people who have wronged you. A sound justice system should not be an “Eye for an eye” system where whatever the offender did to someone then he or she faces the same punishment. The “Get tough on crime” rhetoric spouted by politicians in the US and other countries around the world is only peddling to the vigilant brigade who are baying for blood. It may win some votes, and it may make some voters feel good for a while, but at the end of the day nothing changes. Voters must be getting fed up with politicians who jump on the prevailing bandwagon. America already has the toughest sentences in the...
Read more

Jennifer needs your help

Image
Written by R. A. Stewart Jennifer Mee was convicted of first degree murder but it was a murder she did not carry out herself or one which there was no intent or premeditation involved. How is this so you may be wondering. In Florida if someone dies as a result of another crime such as robbery then all participants are equally guilty of the death irrespective of the part they played. Here is a summary of the case: In 2010 Jennifer, then aged 19, agreed to go out on a date with a young man she had contacted on Facebook. Jennifer’s motive was robbery, not romance, and with the help of two male friends she tried to rob her date, however, in the struggle he was fatally shot. Under Florida law, all participants in a fatal robbery are equally guilty of first degree murder. This is known as the “Felony rule.” There is no room for discretion in the application of this rule. One is either guilty of it or not.  Intent or lack of it is not taken into consideration as it should be which means s...
Read more