FLORIDA LAWMAKER'S DICTIONARY

The Florida dictionary according to lawmakers
The Florida lawmakers seem to be reading a different dictionary from the rest of us if you examine the Jennifer Mee case.
Jennifer was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole after she was party to a fatal robbery.
At no stage did she ever intend to kill the victim. 
So we come to our first word, "Premeditated."
What does that word mean?
"Planned in advance," "a premeditated attack."
In Jennifer's case, robbery was planned in advance but not the victim.
I understand that first and second degree murder is a killing which was premeditated.
Then how did Jennifer get to be charged with first degree murder?
Next word is "manslaughter."
At school the teacher told us the difference between murder and manslaughter is murder is when you killed someone intentionally while manslaughter is when you accidently killed someone.
So if a drunk driver kills someone is it murder or manslaughter?
What is the difference between someone who deliberately drives a car into a crowd and someone dies and someone else who makes an error of judgement such as texting someone while driving and has an accident as a result?
"intent."
It is their intent which determines whether they have committed murder or manslaughter.
The dictionary describes intent as this, "If you are intent on doing something you are determined to do it."
There is no doubt whatsoever that Jennifer never ever intended to kill the victim.
So how can she be guilty of murder?
I don't know what is worse, being convicted of first degree murder or being sentenced without the possibility of parole.
This was a high profile case because of Jennifer's notoriety as the "Hiccup Girl." It polarised more than a community, it made television headlines beyond Florida, so I wonder whether Jennifer would have received the same sentence if this was just a run of the mill murder case in America. 
Judges are supposed to rise above emotions during court cases but I cannot honestly say whether in this case the judge did or didn't rise about the emotion of the case or what motivated him or her to hand down such a sentence but I am interested to hear the justification for it.
The bottom line is Jennifer should not have been charged with first degree murder at all but then to be sentenced to life without the possibility of parole is inhumane and unjust.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SOCIAL STATUS & AMERICAN SENTENCING

Image
Sentencing based on social standing At high school when someone got the cane or strap, the other kids would make fun of the person if they were not that popular but if they were popular among their peers then after getting the strap or cane it would always  be, "Mr so and so is a w*****. It is the same in real life where people get treated according to their personality, attractiveness, and their social status.  As far as the American justice system is concerned, I think it would be extremely simplistic to say "Everyone is treated the same way," and the various sentences handed down by judges reflects this. The sentencing of Jennifer Mee is a prime example. She was convicted of first degree murder. What was her crime? She participated in a fatal robbery and all those who took part in a robbery where someone dies are equally guilty of murder whether were directly or indirectly involved in the death. As far as Jennifer's situation is concerned, it app
Read more

JENNIFER'S CASE HAS A CASE FOR A PRESIDENTIAL PARDON

Image
  Jennifer Mee's case needs to be reviewed Jennifer Mee was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole after being convicted of first degree murder in 2010. She was 19 at the time.  The case Jennifer set up a date with a young man whom she had contacted on Facebook but with the intention of robbing him. Her two male friends carried out the robbery and it was during this process that one of them shot the victim. Jennifer did not ever intend for this to happen. There are three factors that need to be considered in cases involving murder because not all cases are the same. There are factors which need to be considered are determining factors in sentencing. I have come up with a list: 1. Was it premeditated/intentional? 2. Was any malice involved? 3. Was revenge a factor? The answer to these questions in Jennifer's case is, "No." Another question is, "Who's responsible for the discharge of a firearm?" Is it the person who is in possessi
Read more

Just what is the meaning of intent?

Image
Just what is the meaning of intent? Written by R. A. Stewart In the United States a person can be sent to prison for the rest of their life for a murder they did not commit and for a death that had no intent involved. How? In many states any person who is involved in a crime which leads to a person’s death can be charged with first degree murder.  Whether they had anything to do with the death or not it does not matter. Just being a party to the crime makes them equally guilty of murder as the one who committed the actual murder. It all boils down to who's responsible for the fatality and whether the actions of another contributed to another person’s death. This is called the “Felony rule.”  You do not even have to be responsible for the person’s death to be responsible for their death; if you just idly stood by and did nothing while others attacked and killed someone then your inaction caused another person’s death and therefore it means you are partly responsible for the fata
Read more