LIFE WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE

 



Is life without parole sentences right? I don't believe so as it leaves those who have made wrong choices without any hope for the future. People can be reformed and are capable of living normal law-abiding lives if given the opportunity to.

Life without parole sentences

A petition presented to the New Zealand parliament called for life without parole sentences for those who kill a serving police officer. The petition had 39,000 signatures. The petition was organised by the mother of a slain police officer.

A life without parole sentence has only been handed down once in New Zealand, for the Christchurch mosque shooter. It is a sentence that tells New Zealand that this is the worst of the worst crime.

Once you start lowering the threshold for handing out life without parole sentences you leave people in prison who would normally lead law-abiding lives with maturity on their side without a hope for the future. It also reduces the seri down seriousness of the worst criminal acts as the same sentences are handed out for the less serious ones.

The huge cost to the tax payer of keeping people locked up is a factor that needs to be considered.

If the government does have the funds to keep people locked up for life then the question is, "What else could they do with the money?"

That is assuming that whoever is inside is capable of turning a corner and living a law-abiding life.

Here is one suggestion: that sentences be reduced and the money which is saved be invested in programs aimed at vulnerable youth.

Law enforcement needs to go after those who take advantage of juveniles and entice them into crime, particularly drugs.

There are examples of offenders who received a life without parole sentence in America after being involved in murder with older folk.

Morgan Leppert from Florida is one of these; as a fifteen-year-old she and her twenty-one year-old boyfriend were involved in the murder of a fifty-eight year old man before stealing his pick-up truck.

Now you have to ask, "Who should shoulder most of the responsibility for this crime? The twenty one year old or the fifteen year old?

American law does not seem to take into account this factor which is not a justification for their actions but rather explains them.

Instead, retribution seems to be a motivating factor in sentencing. Getting even with those who have wronged us may give the victim's relatives some satisfaction but it does not bring them back. In fact, being a victim or a victor is a choice one makes and that is an attitude.

Is there any circumstance where a sentence of life without parole is justified?

When therre is a risk to the public but that needs to be assessed as it already is when offenders apply for parole.

In the case of the Christchurch mosque shooter, there will be some who treat him as a hero if he is released, therefore, there is the risk that he will inspire others to commit a similar crime.

Life without parole sentences should be handed out only in exceptional cases and the Mosque attack is one of those exceptional cases.

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Bobby Stewart is campaigning for the release or resentencing of Florida woman Jennifer Mee who was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole as a nineteen year old in 2010. He has written his thoughts about her case on www.freejennifer.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SOCIAL STATUS & AMERICAN SENTENCING

Image
Sentencing based on social standing At high school when someone got the cane or strap, the other kids would make fun of the person if they were not that popular but if they were popular among their peers then after getting the strap or cane it would always  be, "Mr so and so is a w*****. It is the same in real life where people get treated according to their personality, attractiveness, and their social status.  As far as the American justice system is concerned, I think it would be extremely simplistic to say "Everyone is treated the same way," and the various sentences handed down by judges reflects this. The sentencing of Jennifer Mee is a prime example. She was convicted of first degree murder. What was her crime? She participated in a fatal robbery and all those who took part in a robbery where someone dies are equally guilty of murder whether were directly or indirectly involved in the death. As far as Jennifer's situation is concerned, it app
Read more

JENNIFER'S CASE HAS A CASE FOR A PRESIDENTIAL PARDON

Image
  Jennifer Mee's case needs to be reviewed Jennifer Mee was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole after being convicted of first degree murder in 2010. She was 19 at the time.  The case Jennifer set up a date with a young man whom she had contacted on Facebook but with the intention of robbing him. Her two male friends carried out the robbery and it was during this process that one of them shot the victim. Jennifer did not ever intend for this to happen. There are three factors that need to be considered in cases involving murder because not all cases are the same. There are factors which need to be considered are determining factors in sentencing. I have come up with a list: 1. Was it premeditated/intentional? 2. Was any malice involved? 3. Was revenge a factor? The answer to these questions in Jennifer's case is, "No." Another question is, "Who's responsible for the discharge of a firearm?" Is it the person who is in possessi
Read more

Just what is the meaning of intent?

Image
Just what is the meaning of intent? Written by R. A. Stewart In the United States a person can be sent to prison for the rest of their life for a murder they did not commit and for a death that had no intent involved. How? In many states any person who is involved in a crime which leads to a person’s death can be charged with first degree murder.  Whether they had anything to do with the death or not it does not matter. Just being a party to the crime makes them equally guilty of murder as the one who committed the actual murder. It all boils down to who's responsible for the fatality and whether the actions of another contributed to another person’s death. This is called the “Felony rule.”  You do not even have to be responsible for the person’s death to be responsible for their death; if you just idly stood by and did nothing while others attacked and killed someone then your inaction caused another person’s death and therefore it means you are partly responsible for the fata
Read more